Blog

Dashboards are reviewed regularly. Metrics guide decisions. Performance is tracked with precision. Compared to intuition-based leadership, this approach feels disciplined and objective.

Most executive teams invest in culture with good intentions. They articulate values. They launch initiatives. They communicate expectations through town halls, leadership offsites, and internal messaging. On paper, the culture is clear. In practice, culture rarely changes.

Risk is easiest to identify when it announces itself. Revenue declines. Customer churn. Operational failures. Public scrutiny. These signals demand attention because they disrupt performance and force response. The harder risks to identify are the ones that exist when nothing appears wrong. Executive teams often misread risk during periods of stability, not because they lack intelligence or experience, but because the absence of visible problems creates false confidence. When

Most corporate failures do not begin with a crisis. They begin in stable environments. In meetings where nothing appears broken. In decisions that feel safe to postpone because there is no immediate pressure to act. By the time consequences surface, the damage is already embedded. The leadership decisions that carry the greatest risk are often the ones that feel least urgent when they are made.

Whenever accountability is introduced, a familiar narrative follows. “I was put in a bad position.” “I wouldn’t have done this if I hadn’t been pushed.” “The system set me up.” In my world, entrapment has a very specific meaning. It applies only when someone is induced to commit an act they were not already inclined to commit. Pressure alone does not qualify. Opportunity does not qualify. Discomfort does not qualify. Predisposition matters. That distinction exists for a reaso

People love to talk about big moments. They talk about crunch time, critical deals, high-stakes decisions. They talk about rising to the occasion when it matters most. In reality, nobody rises to the occasion. They fall to their level of preparation. When pressure hits, teams do not suddenly become disciplined or aligned. They revert to whatever habits they have already built. If communication breaks down under stress, it was already fragile. If execution slows when stakes ar